Report cover for Compensation, Benefit, and Bonus Authority in Calendar Year 2017.


Our objective was to determine whether the U.S. Postal Service complied with the applicable maximum total compensation provisions of the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 (PAEA), related Postal Service policies and guidelines, and IRS regulations in calendar year (CY) 2017. The PAEA amended portions of 39 U.S.C. by revising the limits on salary and total compensation paid to Postal Service employees, executives, and officers.

For CY 2017, the annual salary of each Postal Service employee was limited to $207,800. Under a bonus or reward program approved by the U.S. Postal Service Board of Governors, the Postal Service could compensate employees up to $240,100 in total compensation. For individuals designated as critical senior executives, total compensation could reach up to $288,120.

For purposes of the first limit above, total compensation includes only an employee’s salary and federal annuity. The second and third limits also include merit lump sum, incentive, recruitment and executive detail bonuses, and the value of non-cash awards. The value of benefits such as financial or retirement counseling, annual leave exchange, health programs, and transportation services are excluded from total compensation, as are payments due to grievance settlements.

What the OIG Found

The Postal Service complied with the provisions relating to the applicable maximum total compensation provisions of PAEA in CY 2017. They also complied with related internal policies and guidelines and IRS regulations for CY 2017 compensation.

However, the Postal Service overstated in the fiscal year 2017 Comprehensive Statement on Postal Operations the amount by which two executives exceeded the CY 2016 compensation limit. This occurred because the value of financial counseling was improperly identified as a reportable benefit. The overstatements are related only to reporting in the Comprehensive Statement on Postal Operations. We did not identify concerns with Postal Service personnel exceeding appropriate compensation limits.

Because of our audit, management implemented new procedures and quality controls to ensure the value of financial planning benefits is properly documented and excluded from the compensation reported in the Comprehensive Statement on Postal Operations.

What the OIG Recommended

Management corrected the issue identified. Therefore, we are not making a recommendation.

Read full report

Comments (4)

  • anon

    Why are bonuses paid out when the USPS is in such financial stress? Or is it? Could this be why employees are so stressed? And benefits reduced? Postal delivery vehicles falling apart? Secret Amazon parcel rates? Who knows where all the money is going? Why does any manager deserve a bonus? The people under that manager are the ones who should get the bonus!!

    Jul 28, 2018
  • anon

    Why do any postal managers get a bonus at all. As a Civil Service industry, you get a salary, and should not expect bonuses for just doing your job. As far as being "executives", there is not reason a USPS manager should be considered an executive. This is not private industry where you have CEOS and executives getting well paid due to their individual business dealings, this is the Post Office.

    Jul 27, 2018
  • anon

    How can executives receive bonuses (pay for performance) when the employees are doing all the work. Incentives should be trickled down to those actual doing the work and not those pushing buttons to make screen numbers acceptable. I'll be lucky to reach a third of those salaries.

    Jul 26, 2018
  • anon

    When I am going to get that

    Jul 25, 2018