Below is a list of our open audit recommendations. When a report is issued, the Postal Service responds to each recommendation, and if there is agreement, it provides a corrective action plan with a date of planned implementation. We request written confirmation from the Postal Service when those corrective actions are completed and evaluate this information and provide concurrence when the recommendation can be closed.
If the Postal Service disagrees with a recommendation, we work towards agreement by elevating discussions between USPS and OIG management. Any recommendations that the Postal Service does not act on remain open and are reported to Congress until a resolution is achieved.
Apply population change factors, such as projected growth and trends of sorting and delivery center locations, as part of its Financial Rigor Tests for the investments.
$0
Open
Disagree
2
Perform inspections and complete route adjustments where needed as part of the required annual process within the year prior to estimating the Financial Rigor Tests related to sorting and delivery center investments.
$0
Open
Disagree
3
Require tracking, reconciling, and reporting of operating costs throughout the Sorting & Delivery Center project, with adjustments to investment calculations for significant changes; and delegate responsibility for the oversight of financial performance over routes related to the project.
Execute a plan to provide stable leadership at the Indianapolis Regional Processing and Distribution Center.
$0
Open
Agree
2
Staff management positions at the Indianapolis Regional Processing and Distribution Center to authorized levels.
$0
Open
Agree
3
Continue to work with local management and staff to improve employee availability at the Indianapolis Regional Processing and Distribution Center to meet the national goal.
$0
Open
Agree
4
Revise projected savings and identify opportunities to improve efficiency of operations in the Indianapolis, IN, region.
$0
Open
Disagree
5
Optimize usage of mail processing equipment at the Indianapolis Regional Processing and Distribution Center, including potential redeployment of underused equipment to facilities that need additional mail processing.
$20,101,122
Open
Disagree
6
Strengthen inventory controls over surface visibility scanners and evaluate implementing an automated system.
$0
Open
Agree
7
Direct the Indianapolis Regional Processing and Distribution Center Processing and Logistics managers to review daily scan data to identify problem areas and correct issues to achieve current scanning goals.
Provide remedial or refresher training to management handling grievances in areas of concern to include topics such as, but not limited to, knowledge of national bargaining and local agreements, grievance arbitration procedures, responding to union requests for information, and contending with challenges from union representatives.
$0
Open
Agree
2
Develop a platform to share best practices identified by individual districts on grievance management and require each district to provide a plan to implement applicable best practices.
$0
Open
Agree
3
Require the use of the Overtime Administration tool at facilities with high or recurring overtime grievances, unless restricted by local agreements.
$83,165,820
Open
Agree
4
Require and reiterate training for supervisors on proper administration of overtime, including, but not limited to, overtime desired lists, equitable distribution of overtime, and craft jurisdiction rules.
$0
Open
Agree
5
1) identify high or recurring grievance payment locations, 2) require applicable local management in those locations to develop and implement an improvement action plan to reduce grievances, and 3) monitor grievance progress in those locations.
$0
Open
Agree
6
Develop guidance to 1) identify which management positions have the authority to enter into local agreements, 2) include risk management practices such as expiration dates, legal review, or mandatory periodic review clauses, for management responsible for negotiating future local agreements, and 3) create a digital repository for local agreements.
$0
Open
Disagree
7
Develop and maintain a national repository for local memorandums of understanding for standardized ease of access by and for all levels of local management.
$0
Open
Agree
8
1) Develop automated controls in the Grievance and Arbitration Tracking System to add system-required fields for justification statements on decision letters, and 2) provide refresher training for supervisors on requirements for proper completion of decision letters.
Establish a common framework with roles and responsibilities for deferred maintenance that applies throughout the organization, standardizing what is considered deferred maintenance and the process for prioritizing and addressing it.
$0
Open
Disagree
2
Prioritize and track all deferred maintenance and associated costs, including capital and maintenance projects, and begin addressing its backlog of maintenance in order of priority.
$0
Open
Disagree
3
Establish procedures, responsibilities, and accountability mechanisms for staff and supervisors to periodically review and validate all data including "estimated cost" within the maintenance system, for completeness and accuracy.
$0
Open
Disagree
4
Ensure that the maintenance system has functionality and reporting capabilities to assist project managers with identifying outstanding maintenance calls and alert supervisors of maintenance calls without periodic updates or resolution.
$0
Open
Agree
5
Establish a policy requiring project managers to provide local management with periodic status updates on reported maintenance issues and document statuses until resolved.
$1,104,129
Open
Disagree
6
Develop a maintenance issue reporting culture through the creation of a communications campaign to raise awareness of prioritizing the reporting of maintenance and safety issues to all employees.
$0
Open
Disagree
7
Improve oversight of its local self-assessment programs by assigning staff to conduct periodic reviews of assessments for facilities under 6,500 square feet and establishing an escalation process to obtain annual assessments from larger facilities for review.
$0
Open
Agree
8
Address all building maintenance, safety, and security issues identified during site visits.
Develop and implement a plan to fill the vacant positions needed at the Santa Clarita Processing and Distribution Center.
$0
Open
Disagree
2
Develop and implement a plan to confirm mail processing and logistics employees effectively communicate, especially during peak dispatch hours, at the Santa Clarita Processing and Distribution Center.
$0
Open
Agree
3
Develop a plan to remove excess mail transport equipment from the docks and verify these are removed timely to maximize capacity at the Santa Clarita Processing and Distribution Center.
$0
Closed
Agree
4
Properly reconcile the Surface Visibility scanners in Ethos and at the facility and take measurable actions to retrieve all lost scanners at the Santa Clarita Processing and Distribution Center.
$9,040
Open
Agree
5
Provide oversight and verify employees sign in and out Surface Visibility scanners at the Santa Clarita Processing and Distribution Center.
$0
Open
Agree
6
Secure scanners and verify only authorized employees can enter the Surface Visibility scanner room at the Santa Clarita Processing and Distribution Center.
$0
Open
Agree
7
Verify all drivers are securing trailer cargo and are using wheel chocks at the Santa Clarita Processing and Distribution Center.