
Driving the Rural Delivery Route
The U.S. Postal Service has almost 80,000 rural delivery routes serviced by some 133,000 rural letter carriers. For some of those routes, USPS provides the vehicle; for others, the carrier uses a private vehicle and receives a maintenance allowance from the Postal Service for wear and tear. In fiscal year (FY) 2020, the Postal Service paid out nearly $583 million in maintenance allowances — a rise of $71 million, or 13 percent, over FY 2015.
Not long ago, the Postal Service started converting some private-vehicle rural routes to USPS-vehicle routes, estimating the change would save $888 million over six years. For a recent audit, we reviewed a sample of these completed conversions nationwide as well as future conversions, and found that the Postal Service’s strategy for these changes was generally effective. We also discovered a few shortcomings.
For instance, maximum savings weren’t realized because USPS wasn’t implementing conversions in a timely manner, and we determined that some of the future conversions wouldn’t be the most cost-effective. We made a couple recommendations to improve the process, and Postal Service management agreed with both.
Are you a rural letter carrier, or do you know one? How does a USPS-vehicle route compare with the private-vehicle route? Does one seem more cost-effective from your point of view?
Leave a Comment
1. Safety - The Outback has all wheel drive and we get to choose the tires we use on her vehicle during the winter months. The Mercedes vans are rear wheel drive and the rural post offices in my area (no joke, dead serious) get hand-me-down tires from the bigger city offices. Seeing my carrier last winter shocked me. Yeah they put snow tires on the rear (just the rear) but they were riding just shy of the wear bars despite the van being new (hand-me-downs from the larger offices). This will definitely lead to a huge safety difference between the two vehicles.
2. Time to complete the route during winter months will be much longer due to the reasons above. Much longer, guaranteed. City maybe not so much but these things weren't designed for rural routes or winter in mind. AWD was an option but post office didn't want to fork over the extra 3k or so per vehicle. Willing to bet they'll pay well more than that in avoidable tow bills over the 30 years they'll run them.
3. Now we have a vehicle that we're making payments on that we purchased solely for delivering the mail. Now that we face losing the ema that previously was covering the payment, we have to add that payment plus full coverage to our budget. Yes selling the car is an option but the value will be reduced do to scratches on the door and the modifications to put the pedal kit in.
I don't know how factors like that can't be considered before purchasing a vehicle to put on a route. Or maybe a heads up letting you know your route is in line for a vehicle in the next two years so you can avoid buying a newer vehicle beforehand.
Vermont inspections are tough, and vehicles must always pass a strict inspection once a year. Very few want to beat up an expensive vehicle and maintain the vehicle to constantly drive a Mail route for the pay offered.
Now let's add the cost of gas along with the maintenence.
The post office needs to provide 4x4 vehicles with AC for summer time. Eventually you are going to run out of willing carriers. It's already happening.
I've worked for USPS as a Rural Letter Carrier, in Wisconsin, for just under 22 years, 9 of those years as an RCA (Substitute Carrier).
I've driven whatever I could afford, at the time, for many years. I know what it's like.
I, for one, prefer to drive my own vehicle to deliver. Unlike the USPS's antiquated LLVs, my POVs have all had, at minimum, HEAT & AIR CONDITIONING. Over the last 2 decades I've been blessed to able to continuously upgrade to newer and better.. SAFER vehicles for myself.
In 2018, I purchased a brand-spanking new Toyota Rav 4 Hybrid, which I specifically chose for delivery.
(This was prior to being buried in Amazon packages later that year.)
In doing so, I doubled my gas mileage on route from 12 mpg (Chevy Blazer) on average, to 24.6 mpg or better. Prior to the recent exorbitant cost of fuel, the EMA I received for my 44K, 61 mile route enabled my vehicle to pay for itself- fuel, insurance, & monthly auto loan payments, and still with a couple hundred left over for tires or other maintenance needs.
In four years I haven't needed to have my brakes done even once! My POV is the best career investment I've ever made. It has a rear camera, air bags, heat, A/C and all-wheel drive, just to name a few of its most prominent safety features.
USPS will never care as much about our safety as we do. I know this for a fact.
I don't want your LLVs, I don't want your Mercedes. I'll keep my POV, you can keep your Metris or any other vehicles that are currently being forced on Rural Carriers across the country.
I find it astounding that these vehicles are making their way onto the POV routes when there are still Rural Carriers in these very same offices being required to continue to utilize the USPS-provided 20-30 year old aluminum deathtrap LLVs in order to make a living to support their families.
To me, that alone, speaks VOLUMES as to where the priorities lie within the United States Postal Service.
It seems they'd rather we were dead than pay us a pittance towards the maintainance of our MUCH SAFER personal vehicles we Rurals use daily in delivering the U.S. Mail.
Here's a thought..
How about replacing the LLVs FIRST before they all spontaneously combust with us inside, and then, give the rest of us a choice? Alot of Carriers would welcome a USPS- Provided delivery vehicle, but not all of us.
Better safe than sorry, they say.
I'd rather be safe, as I feel I am now, than for USPS to be sorry later.
I’ve battled the numerous times over the years to try to continue to use my safer, more efficient, more reliable POV instead of a newly assigned LLV or Metris.
USPS: read all these comments. There are plenty of carriers who would love to have a brand new Metris assigned to their route. Otherwise, replace one of the dangerous and costly LLV’s (like Diana suggests) with the Metris you are shoving down my throat. Please treat your carriers with some respect.
Brakes front and back every 4 months $1200 X 3 $3600 Not calipers that's extra
3 sets of tires a year, $700, $700, snow tires $ 900 $2300
oil changes 12 a year $600. Car Payments $4,400 yearly! Extra Insurance $1200. And the big Kicker I just dumped $3000 in all struts, ball Joints, all hard ware, then wheel bearings also front end, aliments. Thats not engine work or when the transmission goes out either! =$12,400
HUM This comes out of my salary! I work to fix a car! I love my country route, but I am not going into Debt! FYI, Postal Service Buy us RHD, OR give us gas money and you pay for all repairs on our cars! Those LLV won't do any good on dirts roads in the snow in Colorado! If your building New Postal trucks, make sure they get thru the snow! LOL! I don't know rather to cry or laugh!
EMA $13, 920 Yearly $58 EMA. I fill up 3 times a week $80. $240 weekly
$12,480 Left over $1,440!!!!! EMA
I spent in car repairs this year $12,400
out of my salary NEGATIVE $10, 960. NOW I AM CRYING! How is this FAIR!~~~
And these vehicles are forever broken down and requiring maintenance. I do not believe that this is a cost savings for the post office considering the purchase and maintenance, but suppose someone who made the decision has to make it look like it was a good deal.