• Reply to: Decreased Volume. Increased Miles   4 years 2 days ago

    What about charging different fees based on the distance the mail has to travel? Perhaps one fee for in-state and a higher one for out-of-state? I think we, as consumers, need to get used to the fact that our Government infrastructure also needs to turn a profit. If it means those that use the service have to pay more, then that's what we have to do. Lest we all lose the service.

  • Reply to: Barriers to Change   4 years 3 days ago

    There is one area that appears to be slanted in your report. You assume that a "Post Office" has only one function that of being a "retail network" and hence should be modeled after all Retail Companies. Nothing could be further from the truth. A "Post Office" houses carrier operations clerk distribution opeartsion and a retail counter most of the work being accomplished inside a "Post Office" fall to the first two categories I list, In fact about 15% is the average time spent on "retai" in a post office. Do you close a post office because 15% of its work load might be shifted to alternate retail sources???? In addition a "Post Office" is the last link in the chain of the distribution model of the postal service. To move post offices further away from its main core of work is fulfilling a self desired result. Hence your report is flawed. Go to a post office and ask the customers what they want done with "their" post office. Most like the town name on the building and the convienence they now have. In addition a Post Office may not take in money in fact most do not. The bulk of USPS Revenue comes from mailing houses in major areas of the country. Yet the work load is spread through out the entire postal service. Should we close a Post Office that is small yet because it has a major banking facility within its domain and makes 30 times what it takes in? Yet close a larger post office because it does the same amount of retail revenue yet is missing that banking facility and therfore loses money????? WHAT NEEDS TO BE FULLY CONSIDERED IS THAT THE USPS IS PART OF THE US CONSTITUTION AND AS SUCH UNTIL CHANGED BY CONGRESS IS A 'SERVICE' PROVIDED TO THE PUBLIC.. not witholding to a monetary figure.

  • Reply to: To Award or Not to Award: What’s the Postal Service to Do?   4 years 3 days ago

    If a person has no quality but he has dedication towards his work then appreciation and giving award increases his passion towards work. So this is necessary.

  • Reply to: Postal Service Network Streamlining   4 years 6 days ago

    The post service of any nation should remain government property. Look at how the Royal Mail of the U.K. has declined since becoming privatized, yet still borrowing huge chunks of public money. Is that what this nation wants? Sometimes I wonder

  • Reply to: Automated Package Stations – Rapidly Expanding Service in Europe!   4 years 1 week ago

    Hope this is introduced into our county. This will help a lot in tracking down snail mails and prevent lost parcels from families and friends.

  • Reply to: A New Kind of Post Office?   4 years 1 week ago

    Very neat and futuristic looking - a bit cold though. Coffee shop is definetely a good idea.

  • Reply to: Training . . . Stay or Pay?   4 years 1 week ago

    I think the answer falls in the gray area. Companies, whether in the private or public sector, have to be prepared to experience loses in training. From an employees perspective, if you have trained me but your organization is below what I would consider a satisfy work environment (not challenging enough, or co-workers are less than favorable, or its too stressful, etc..), then i should have the right to leave with no strings attached. In this regard companies tend to have their training department play up all the great things about a company without pointing out some of the things may be deterrents to certain individuals. On the other hand, companies should have the right to "collect" on the investment of upper-level training but should be limited to only require that they work the amount of time it took to train them and not some empirical number of the amount they were expecting to profit from the trained individual.

  • Reply to: Training . . . Stay or Pay?   4 years 1 week ago

    Well, it's because CEU's are things that motivated people usually
    aquire in an effort to have more mobility in the workplace.
    From my observations, errrr, I mean through the eyes of a "casual"
    observer; the postal attitude is "I'll be here till I retire".

    Now, let's dissect the statement.
    I'll - I'm only interested in my world.
    be here- Like a tick on a dog. I'm not going anywhere...
    till I retire- Why apply myself? I'm never going any where else.

    Missing adverb between be and here - "working"

  • Reply to: To Award or Not to Award: What’s the Postal Service to Do?   4 years 1 week ago

    According to me, we should appreciate our employes this will give honor to them and they will pay extra attention towards their works.

  • Reply to: Training . . . Stay or Pay?   4 years 1 week ago

    I have often wondered why there is no continuing education for the clerk and carrier crafts. We are the ones that spot postage and mail-ability problems.

    Another thing to consider is the lost revenue of items being delivered without regard to proper postage, specially in small offices.

    I see it on a daily basis. Items mailed at Media rate receiving forwarding service without charge, parcel post items returned or forwarded without charge. BBM not being charged on return service. And now with the new parcel select regulation regarding forwarding of items and surcharges, without proper training and supervision, this service will not be handled right.

    It wouldnt take much to keep the employees informed on things. A half day or whole day of training for updating employees once a year, mandatory should do it. The cost to the post office would be small considering the revenue that is lost from ignorance in small offices around the country.

  • Reply to: The OIG Wants to Know How You Feel about Sick Leave   4 years 1 week ago

    Ive been reading a lot about this subject lately and i learned a little more from reading this, thanks for the post

  • Reply to: Decreased Volume. Increased Miles   4 years 1 week ago

    Yes, reviewing service standards is a must, but smart network management is another competence the Postal Service must seek. For instance, Deutsche Post will bypass outgoing processing at some originating plants (when volumes are low) and truck mail to other plants to consolidate outgoing volumes. In doing so, they save labor at the bypassed plants and benefits from economies of scale at the consolidation plants. Labor being more expensive than transportation (per unit worked or transported), this yields savings for them. The Postal Service's plant network is sufficiently dense that, by adopting a measure similar to that of Deutsche Post, service commitments would not suffer, even if unchanged.

    In recent discussions with a former executive at UPS, he informed me that the cost of data capture and management had risen dramatically in their organization, because they run their business in near real time (network distribution decisions, hub staffing decisions, transportation mode assignment). But the payback has been that (1) they can operate at 99% service performance, and (2) overall operational costs are down....

    As long as the current business model prevails at the Postal Service (i.e., one that makes up for cost contributions by increasing volumes, that are in a spiraling decline) there will be a compelling need to turn the organization into a knowledge-driven one. This is a difficult but necessary undertaking.


  • Reply to: Decreased Volume. Increased Miles   4 years 1 week ago

    The best way to reduce miles (and, more importantly, transportation costs) would be to allow Postal management some latitude in changing service standards. There are a few that are costly to maintain. Those should be downgraded, while others can be upgraded with minimal impact on costs. Current Postal service standards are based on outdated, decades-old, transportation options.

  • Reply to: Too Much Management Turnover?   4 years 1 week ago

    Lori - Thank you for your response on this subject. We appreciate you sharing the information.

  • Reply to: Too Much Management Turnover?   4 years 1 week ago

    Janet - Thank you for taking time to share your thoughts on this issue. We appreciate the input.

  • Reply to: City Delivery Route Consolidation   4 years 1 week ago

    As a senior worker myself, I can imagine the pain of the older delivery staff trying to keep the job while fighting the aches and pains that the aging body brings!

  • Reply to: Too Much Management Turnover?   4 years 1 week ago

    My office has had an OIC for about two years. Our current PM is at a neighboring PO in which the OIC of my PO is the current PM there. They both have not "officially" been at their proper (current) PO. Shouldn't they be at their respected Post Offices?!?

  • Reply to: A New Kind of Post Office?   4 years 1 week ago

    Since a lot of small businesses use the post office, maybe a library of books dedicated to small business that would include resource books on government programs, business marketing and business planning. Coffee idea good too : )

  • Reply to: Too Much Management Turnover?   4 years 2 weeks ago

    I believe that the postmasters and supervisors in the field really do want to do the right thing, but any time we ask questions, we get many varied answers depending on who we talk to. Bulk mailings requirements are so complex that no one can really understand what to do and when to do it. We have many "training" conferences on the internet, but who can actually learn much from those? We need someone either to show us in a classroom setting or to come to our offices and give us some honest feedback. The only true training we get is at Postmaster's convention and that leave has been taken away now!

  • Reply to: Barriers to Change   4 years 2 weeks ago

    Here's something you'd better keep you're eyes on..... And, I'm certain you've thought of it. It's called confidence in you're organization, and it's structure.......

    WorkSafe B.C. has moved 2,500 clients to direct deposit payments instead of mailed cheques since the Canada Post labour dispute began, as the postal shutdown adds impetus to a continuing trend.

    The number of requests for direct deposit has grown from about 40 a day to 500 a day in the past few weeks, says WorkSafe B.C.

    "We are very encouraged by that trend but there's still lots of people who want a printed cheque," said Scott McCloy, WorkSafe B.C.'s director of communications.

    Canada Post locked out 50,000 employees and suspended operations across the country last Tuesday following 12 days of rotating strikes.

    The federal government introduced back-to-work legislation Monday to force an end to the work stoppage. It said it was prepared to limit debate in Parliament so that the law is passed as early as this week.

    Read more: http://www.timescolonist.com/business/Postal+lockout+forces+search+alternatives/4979493/story.html#ixzz1Q6MWuRk6

  • Reply to: The Postal Service’s Green Initiatives   4 years 2 weeks ago

    Postal service has taken a very good step, I hope others will follow suite as going green is really to our advantage.

  • Reply to: Neighborhood Mail and the Future of the Postal Service   4 years 2 weeks ago

    I pitched something which may be similar to Simplified Address which I called the Virtual Address. The virtual address the 9-digit postal code and adds two digits to specify the house and then a PIN code for each recipient with a household so that you have . Marketing has renamed this the Universal Address.

    The premise goes a few steps further than what I understand is meant by the Simplified Address in that advertisers no longer need to know where you live - your privacy is protected. Only USPS would know your address. But since we don't correlate people with the address, your privacy is truly protected. The virtual address is a routing mechanism for physical and digital communications (mail, packages, messages, etc.). Each virtual address would have a profile associated with it, which consumers can customize with mailing preferences, to borrow from the Mail My Way concept by Steve Dearing.

    Advertisers no longer need address lists or address databases, since all they need is a set of virtual addresses with the profiles of the right demographics they're targeting. Likewise, address data would no longer be stored in numerous systems on the Internet and could no longer be used to validate identities. You take away the honeypot and you take away the incentive for such data to be stolen.

    Combining the virtual address and Mail My Way would allow senders to convey messages or send items to recipients to the routing mechanism and based on the item, be it physical or digital, and based on the recipient's preferences, the item would be passed to the appropriate channel, be it a digital device, a mailbox, an e-parcel locker, a digital vault, etc.

    If this is what is meant by Simplified Address, then, yes, this is definitely something USPS should be doing. When I pitched the idea to Vint Cerf at Google last summer, he agreed that it has the prospects of being a game changer.

  • Reply to: Taking the Postal Platform to the Digital World   4 years 2 weeks ago

    These are all good ideas. I've been pitching them for three years. People before me have pitched them as far back as 1981 when USPS invented e-mail but was blocked from entering the business commercially.

    If you want to see what USPS is capable of, let the company operate like a real company and give it some flexibility to decide products and services on their own as well as prices. We have the integrity to help small and medium businesses succeed and be an enabler and not a monopoly in every opportunity.

    Have regulatory oversight but limit what the PRC can do. Right now, our hands are tied. We have plenty of good ideas on the table but no authority or approval to execute them. Let us calculate our own risks. We're the nation's second largest company. I think we could be trusted to make smart decisions.

  • Reply to: Should the Postal Service Offer Volume Incentives to E-Retailers?   4 years 2 weeks ago

    USPS has been doing volume-driven discounts with the Summer Sale, Winter Sale, etc. As long as the discount covers the expense and overhead and still yields some margin for profit and as long as it isn't viewed as unfair competition to other shippers, indeed we should be offering such discounts on packages.

  • Reply to: Neighborhood Mail and the Future of the Postal Service   4 years 2 weeks ago

    waste of trees? guess what - because you are receiving things in the mail (and paper is being printed) it has actually made it so much better http://printgrowstrees.com/facts.html