As package volumes climb, so too has the U.S. Postal Service’s investments in sorting systems. Since 2015, it has deployed 33 Small Package Sorting System (SPSS) machines costing over $141 million. It intended to invest another $23 million to have seven more SPSS machines operational during the current holiday season.

The SPSS machine was designed to support package delivery by automating package sorting, alleviating existing processing capacity shortfalls, and reducing manual sorting. We recently conducted an audit to evaluate the throughput and productivity performances of the 33 deployed SPSS machines. Throughput is the average number of packages sorted in an hour. Productivity is the average number of packages sorted per employee workhour.   

We found that, on average nationally, the SPSS machines exceeded their throughput performance goal by about 5 percent from January 1, 2016, through July 31, 2017.

  • Throughput goal was 4,500 packages per hour.
  • The achieved throughput was 4,737 packages per hour.
  • 23 of the 33 SPSS machines exceeded the goal with the other 10 falling below the goal.

When we measured average national machine productivity in the same period, however, we found the Postal Service fell short of its goal by 17 percent:

  • SPSS productivity goal was 385 packages per labor hour.
  • The achieved productivity was 319 packages.

Our review included one high-performing site and four low-performing sites. At the high-performing site, we noted best practices that included monitoring and correcting staff labor code selections for reporting workhours; using standard work instructions for machine set-up and restart; and matching SPSS staffing to package volume. At the low-performing sites we reported a lack of supervisory presence and planning that resulted in the exact opposite outcomes – incorrect labor code selections, no standard work instructions, and insufficient package volume to support staffing levels.

We ultimately recommended better supervision and planning to improve SPSS productivity and throughput, including that management ensure staffing matched package volume. We calculated that USPS would save about $24.8 million in labor costs annually by correcting the causes of low productivity nationally.

Do you work in a facility with an SPSS machine? If so, what are your experiences with the machines?

Comments (4)

  • anon

    Check earlier messages pls -so frustrated about my mail and packages always sent to wrong addresses.

    Dec 29, 2017
  • anon

    I believe there has to be a look into the logistics and movement of mail and packages. Example; I had packages shipped from Atlanta GA package went to Pembroke Pines FL and id currently in route. Why would you send package(s) out of route. Being a truck driver for a number of years this is a very large waste of time and movement of packages/mail. Atlanta GA to Buffalo IA do the route. I understand that everything has to be sorted and shipped according to destinations. But come on Georgia to Florida to Iowa. Logistics needs to be looked into. Perhaps the USPS needs to research how UPS and FedEx does it. They seem to have a very good mode of operations.

    Dec 23, 2017
  • anon

    We're having difficulty with a firearm issue.. We've been told that USPS letter carriers can accept firearms packaged for delivery from customers. They in turn take the package back to their office(along with form 1508) for processing. The DMM doesn't specify any language about carrier involvement regarding handling of firearm packages. Any information you can share about this issue will be greatly appreciated..Thank you

    Dec 20, 2017
  • anon

    Thank you for your comment. The OIG is an independent agency of the Postal Service and this issue falls outside of our jurisdiction. You should contact your local postmaster to find out the rules regarding the shipping of firearms.

    Jan 04, 2018

Share this post

Recent Comments

Monthly Archive