Expands the main menu

Breadcrumb

Pushing the Envelope Blog

Do Post Offices Cover Costs?

Date: 04/19/21 | Category: Finances: Cost & Revenue

You’ve probably noticed that wherever you go in this country, it’s pretty easy to find a post office. After all, the U.S. Postal Service has the largest retail network in the country, using its more than 31,000 locations to provide vital services like mailing and shipping, passport processing, and money orders to the American public. But did you ever wonder if post offices produce enough revenue to cover their operating costs?

A new OIG white paper, Revenue and Costs in the Retail Network, looked into this very question. Our research found that overall, USPS-managed post offices generated about twice as much revenue as they cost to run. These findings varied widely by individual post office, with 42 percent of post offices nationwide not producing enough revenue to cover their retail costs. In rural areas, 60 percent of offices did not cover their costs.

We identified opportunities to increase revenues and reduce costs. For example, the Postal Service could explore expanding the number of services it offers at the retail counter. The Postal Service already partners with government agencies to provide services at some post offices, such as providing fingerprinting in coordination with the FBI, and it could broaden these offerings. In addition, the Postal Service could lease unused space in post offices to government agencies or private businesses, allowing it to earn more revenue while providing helpful services such as health kiosks. The Postal Service could also consider outsourcing the operation of more post offices, a cost‑saving strategy used by some international posts. 

Tell us what you think. What services would you like to see offered at your local post office? Are there other ways in which USPS could cut the operating costs of or increase revenues at post offices?

Leave a Comment

Your Name
pete Panos
Apr 19, 2022
Your Comment
Services should be added or reduced as required by demand.

With all the money wasted in other areas and give aways there should never be cuts to the PO Budget .

The PO is an American institution and not a business.
Your Name
Matthewcaw
Jan 20, 2022
Your Comment
You are certainly right. In it something is also I think, what is it excellent thought.
Your Name
AnthonyAwalo
Jan 14, 2022
Your Comment
Earlier I thought differently, many thanks for the information.
Your Name
William Higgs
May 22, 2021
Your Comment
this article is describing the post office as if it were a business. Let us be 100% clear here. The post office is a public service. Not a business. Its mission is to serve the public. It is funded by both consumers of the service as well as the federal government to keep services affordable for consumers. Your attempt to change the postal service from a public service to a business just reveals a disgusting agenda to undermine the mail, and any inspector general of this mindset is unworthy of their office and needs to resign.
Your Name
amroune
Apr 25, 2021
Your Comment
Good post thanks for share information.
Your Name
Jonathan Myers
Apr 24, 2021
Your Comment
I’m a USPS employee and I love the agency. When I was a kid, I followed my grandma out to the mailbox 6 days a week so she could talk to our carrier, and it really seemed like there was a social component to the whole thing. It wasn’t just about getting that day’s mail, but rather, she kept up on all the latest happenings in the neighborhood. So for me, it’s really important that USPS is allowed to diversify and offer more services. I think some of the most realistic ones are notary services, scan / copy services, and maybe a photo machine that ppl could use to print out photos. Those probably aren’t huge moneymakers, but I think a big step would be offering services that ppl can use at a post office. As it stands, a lot of ppl just move on to one of our competitors bc they offer a service that we don’t offer.
Your Name
JUDY STUMP
Apr 19, 2021
Your Comment
In rural areas we often only have 1 option for Internet. High speed hasn't been heard of yet. Every post office has a satellite connection, it would still involve 3rd party but let the Post Office supply affordable high speed Internet to these rural areas.
Your Name
Amy Wang
Apr 19, 2021
Your Comment
Fax and copy services; notary services; combine and office space with each States Division of Motor Vehicles; and actually abolish the federal amendment so the Postal Service can accept and deliver wine and alcohol to compete with FEDEX AND UPS;
Your Name
Jack Rosenstein
Apr 19, 2021
Your Comment
You have lost a lot of business because you do not do collection pick-up routes from businesses late in the afternoon like UPS or FedEx. Many places do not have their outgoing mail ready early in the morning.
  
Your Name
Sherrod donarough
Apr 23, 2021
Your Comment
where exactly are the late afternoon routes and postal services at in rural county retail areas? FedEx and UPS has always been one step ahead with there logistics and newer model looking vehicles, but I believe with the right dates,times,and location the older vehicles of the postal service will give those newer models and good run for the title of best delivery vehicle member of the USA, what do you think Jack R?

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

     
Your Name
Cartero
Jan 23, 2022
Your Comment
About 20 years ago after bumping up pick up schedules to multiple times daily to empty stuffed boxes the service reversed direction to cut cost. Boxes were withdrawn as fewer people used them as email took over. Rural or urban areas the boxes stopped the late pick ups so the service does not have to hire a carrier to work later hours in order to make the pick up time and make it back to their station to meet a dispatch truck.

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

  
Your Name
Gloria Martindale
May 27, 2021
Your Comment
That's what the big blue mail boxes are for. You'll find them in most business areas. We do have a truck that goes around and collects from those boxes 6 days a week.

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)