on May 2nd, 2011 in Ideas Worth Exploring | 2 comments
 
President Obama’s State of the Union address in January included the announcement of the National Wireless Initiative, which would expand wireless broadband coverage to 98 percent of the population within 5 years. With that large percentage of the population on the verge of being wired, could such a network be leveraged by the U.S. Postal Service to modernize its obligation to deliver mail to every household in America? The initiative provides financial incentives for private industry to expand wireless broadband infrastructure. The incentives are necessary because building a nationwide, interconnected communications network is cost prohibitive in some areas of the country. Once constructed, though, this network will be used by government agencies for a number of purposes including coordinating emergency response and communicating important information directly with citizens. The Postal Service must provide universal service to every address in the United States under the Universal Service Obligation (USO). The USO requires that Americans have ready access to postal products and services through postal carriers, collection boxes and post offices. It also requires the Postal Service to deliver the mail to every street address, six days a week. Perhaps the Postal Service could connect every physical address with a secure e-mail address. Other countries offer similar services, such as Finland’s NetPosti, which is a digital alternative to the physical mailbox. Every citizen gets an account and an e-mail address tied to his or her social security number. Postal customers could opt to use hybrid mail and have their letters and flats scanned and delivered to the customer’s secure postal e-mail box instead of to a physical mailbox. The Postal Service could also print and deliver the letters from a sender’s e-mail box to a recipient’s physical address if so desired by the sender. A number of private sector companies have made limited attempts at providing such a service in the United States, such as Zoombox, but none of them have the resources or infrastructure at the Postal Service’s disposal to offer reliable hybrid mail service to a national audience. Let us know what you think. Should the Postal Service explore the realities of implementing this service in the near future and use the internet to help meet its universal service obligation? This blog is hosted by the OIG’s Risk Analysis Research Center (RARC).

Comments

The question is not whether the Postal Service should use the internet to provide USO's, but, should the internet use the Postal Service to meet it's UUG's goals.
If the Postal Service expects to survive another six to nine fiscal quarters, they better use the internet for nearly 88% of their sales.
Printible Stamps, postage, addresses. Access every data base available
and sell sell sell it before google or fb does.
KIOSKS, KIOSKS, MOBILITY SALES, PENETRATE EVERY MOBILE, GREEN, SUSTAINABLE, CLIMATE FRIENDLY/ENERGY SAVING MODEL AVAILIBLE!!!!
USE robots in malls. "Stamps here", "get your fresh stamps here".
"Prepaid envelopes here"!!! Mother's Day is in one month, "prepay you're special greeting here", "We'll mail it on time"......
It's HAMMER TIME!!!!
If a mailing goes out, and an envelope has a blank side, offer a discount to the customer to stamp an add to the blank side of the envelope.
DO DOUBLE DUTY ON PROCESSING OF EVERY PIECE OF MAIL! SAVE MONEY, SAVE TIME, SAVE ENERGY, GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are you going to wait until another energy crisis????
Or the next apocolypse? aka, you're soon to be empty fiscal coffers..

Thanks for your comments and for voting! Your responses help us to develop topics to research and blog about.

Add new comment

This site provides a forum to discuss different aspects of the United States Postal Service and how it can be improved. We encourage you to share your comments, ideas, and concerns.

This is a moderated site—we will review all comments before posting them. We expect that participants will treat each other with respect. We will not post comments that contain vulgar language, personal attacks of any kind, or offensive terms that target specific individuals or groups. We will not post comments that are clearly off-topic or that promote services or products. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted.

We ask that reporters send questions to the USPS OIG Media Office through their normal channels and refrain from submitting questions here as comments. We will not post questions from reporters.

We recognize that the Web is a 24/7 medium, and your comments are welcome at any time. Given the need to manage Federal resources effectively, however, we will review comments and post them from 9:00 a.m—5:00 p.m Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. We will read and post comments submitted after hours, on weekends, or on holidays as early as possible the next business day.

To protect your own privacy, and the privacy of others, please do not include personal information or personally identifiable information such as names, addresses, phone numbers or e-mail addresses in the body of your comment.

Except when specifically noted, any views or opinions expressed on this forum (or any other forums available via an RSS feed) are those of the individual bloggers. The views and posted comments do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General, or the Federal government.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy and disclaimer. We plan to blog weekly on as many emerging new media topics as possible. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.