on Feb 7th, 2011 in Ideas Worth Exploring | 3 comments
 
[dropcap style="font-size: 60px; color: #9b9b9b;"] I [/dropcap]n recent years, a growing number of people have chosen to avoid crowded shopping malls by doing their holiday shopping online. To a certain extent, online shopping reduces their carbon footprint by keeping these individuals from driving to and from the store. However, their packages still have to be delivered. What if postal customers could choose to have carbon neutral delivery for an extra fee? In 2009, Itella, Finland’s postal service, introduced a program where customers could pay extra for carbon neutral delivery, adding the “Itella Green” marking to letters for less than a penny or parcels for around five cents. Itella achieved carbon neutrality through a combination of energy efficient delivery vehicles by funding reputable, environmentally-friendly projects. While Itella’s plans include increasing carbon efficiency in all three phases of the package delivery process: sorting, transportation, and delivery, the greatest carbon efficiency gains currently come from their shift to electric or fuel efficient delivery vehicles. On February 1 Itella made the cost of carbon neutrality a standard part of all postage, making it the first country to offer completely carbon neutral delivery. That way, when a customer uses Itella to send a letter, package, or direct mail, they know they are getting zero net emissions. Through their efforts, Itella has made carbon neutral delivery, a key element in developing a “green” reputation and an advantage in competitive areas like package delivery. Is offering carbon neutral delivery as a separate, specialized service that customers can purchase an idea worth exploring for the Postal Service? The Postal Service is already in the process of converting its delivery fleet to cleaner electric vehicles, making carbon neutrality easier to achieve in the coming years. Moreover, does it make sense to give consumers a choice in terms of the environmental friendliness of their mail delivery? Sources: Hellmail Itella This topic is hosted by the OIG’s Risk Analysis Research Center (RARC).

3 Comments

You mean like the Chevrolet Volt with a curb weight of #3,500.
So which part of Physics did we "Change"?
Newton's first second or third law?

If I were the King of the Post Office, I would be looking into changing the quantity of assets required to
transport the quality of information from Point A to Point B.

The entire world is striving for cleaner emissions and most people would not be willing to pay extra for the post office to charge extra for a carbon free delivery, however, since the global warming is such an important topic, local post offices could begin asking for donations from the people they deliver to. Local campaigning would have a direct and immediate impact on the very area in which the donors live.

Also on point of subject.
So explain to me how "Postal Customer" is going to benefit from
the global Chamber of Commerce reduction initiative of greenhouse gas?
(does one exist?)

http://www.globalclimatelaw.com/uploads/file/Petioners%20Nonbinding%20Statement%20of%20Issues.pdf

Then explain the "skinny" on IRS pre-paid debit card tax
refund pilot program, it's communication strategy (which
includes mailing 600K letters of invitation to select low income participants),
and the logic behind how this FC letter killer will sustain the Postal business model.? (Testimony 03/04/2011)
When in reality, it ultimately serves to expand interchange
charges to the financial services industry, and indirectly
to the back of the consumer.

Additionally, comparing the USPS to the interstate highway
system could not be farther from the truth. i.e., the cost of building
a mile of interstate highway in Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma vs. City of Bridges, Pennsylvania.

And, this may sting a bit, but the concept of intellectual
property at the post office is simply not evident! Unless
of course your defining "intellectual" as the MOU's
on pilot programs that appear to be in vogue with
government consultant circles these day's.

Add new comment

This site provides a forum to discuss different aspects of the United States Postal Service and how it can be improved. We encourage you to share your comments, ideas, and concerns.

This is a moderated site—we will review all comments before posting them. We expect that participants will treat each other with respect. We will not post comments that contain vulgar language, personal attacks of any kind, or offensive terms that target specific individuals or groups. We will not post comments that are clearly off-topic or that promote services or products. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted.

We ask that reporters send questions to the USPS OIG Media Office through their normal channels and refrain from submitting questions here as comments. We will not post questions from reporters.

We recognize that the Web is a 24/7 medium, and your comments are welcome at any time. Given the need to manage Federal resources effectively, however, we will review comments and post them from 9:00 a.m—5:00 p.m Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. We will read and post comments submitted after hours, on weekends, or on holidays as early as possible the next business day.

To protect your own privacy, and the privacy of others, please do not include personal information or personally identifiable information such as names, addresses, phone numbers or e-mail addresses in the body of your comment.

Except when specifically noted, any views or opinions expressed on this forum (or any other forums available via an RSS feed) are those of the individual bloggers. The views and posted comments do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General, or the Federal government.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy and disclaimer. We plan to blog weekly on as many emerging new media topics as possible. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.